[tex-live] gs reports error: "Embedded font uses undefined procedure(s)"

[Thanh Han The]

thanks for the translation.

another thing to notice is that the ps file created by dvips
is ok, although the embedded fonts in pdf and ps are almost
identical (apart from the subset tag). Looks likely a gs
problem.

Regards,
Thanh


On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:18:23PM +0200, Frank K�ster wrote:
> "George N. White III" <gnwiii at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I found an old posting for this in
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/de.comp.text.tex
>
> Do you need it translated?
>
> >> lmodern oder mathpazo z.B. laufen ohne Warnungen durch.
>
> No warnings with e.g.  ...
> >
> > Interessant. In lmr10.pfb findet man �ber t1disasm
> >
> > /RD{string currentfile exch readstring pop}executeonly def
> > /ND{noaccess def}executeonly def
> >
> > genau so, wie es in den Type1 Spezifikationen von Adobe steht. In
> > bchr8a.pfb steht dagegen
>
> exactly as in the type1 specification by Adobe.  In bchr8a.pfb, however,
>
> > userdict /RD {string currentfile exch readstring pop} executeonly put
> > userdict /ND {noaccess def} executeonly put
> >
> > Wenn ich die Type1 Spezifikationen richtig verstehe, ist das auch eine
> > legale Definition f�r RD und ND. In der PDF Spezifikation finde ich
> > nichts zu diesem Thema. Sieht f�r mich eher nach einem Fehler in gs aus.
> > Vielleicht habe ich aber auch etwas �bersehen ...
>
> If I understand the Type1 spec correctly, this is also a legal
> definition for RD and ND.  In the PDF spec, I cannot find anything on
> the topic.  Looks rather like a bug in gs to me.  But maybe I missed
> something.
>
> Gru�, Frank
> --
> Frank K�ster
> Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Z�rich
> Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)