[texhax] Who can tell me what's the font used in the picture?

[Steven Woody]

On 16 April 2011 14:08, Steven Woody <narkewoody at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 April 2011 22:42, Reinhard Kotucha <reinhard.kotucha at web.de> wrote:
>> On 2011-04-15 at 20:42:57 +0800, Steven Woody wrote:
>>
>>  > On 15 April 2011 19:33, William Adams <will.adams at frycomm.com> wrote:
>>  > > On Apr 15, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Ivan Griffin wrote:
>>  > >
>>  > >> And taking this further, Inkscape can parse the PDF, and (via the inkscape2tikz extension) can generate TikZ to render this - see the attached LaTeX code.
>>  > >>
>>  > >> http://code.google.com/p/inkscape2tikz/
>>  > >
>>  > > Neat!
>>  > >
>>  > > Is it a tikz limitation that the colours are defined as RGB or was it Inkscape which caused that?
>>  > >
>>  > > \definecolor{c7dcc35}{RGB}{125,204,53}
>>  > > \definecolor{c5a5758}{RGB}{90,87,88}
>>  > >
>>  > > The original .pdf had them as a CMYK green and CMYK grey, so the not-triplet RGB not-quite grey is kind of odd --- no colour profile applied, so a colour w/ a cast to it is IMO wrong.
>>  > >
>>  > > William
>>  > >
>>  >
>>  > William, do you think I can read out the CMYK values from the PDF and
>>  > change the tikz definitions in Ivan's tex file?  Another relative
>>  > question: given any color on my screen, is there a tool that can tell
>>  > me its CMYK values?  I love CMYK more than RGB.
>>
>> From the PDF file:
>>
>>  <xapG:Colorants>
>>     <rdf:Seq>
>>        <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource">
>>           <xapG:swatchName>Landis+Gyr Green (51/0/94/0)</xapG:swatchName>
>>           <xapG:mode>CMYK</xapG:mode>
>>           <xapG:type>PROCESS</xapG:type>
>>           <xapG:cyan>51.000000</xapG:cyan>
>>           <xapG:magenta>0.000000</xapG:magenta>
>>           <xapG:yellow>94.000000</xapG:yellow>
>>           <xapG:black>0.000000</xapG:black>
>>        </rdf:li>
>>        <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource">
>>           <xapG:swatchName>Landis+Gyr Gray (0/0/0/75)</xapG:swatchName>
>>           <xapG:mode>CMYK</xapG:mode>
>>           <xapG:type>PROCESS</xapG:type>
>>           <xapG:cyan>0.000000</xapG:cyan>
>>           <xapG:magenta>0.000000</xapG:magenta>
>>           <xapG:yellow>0.000000</xapG:yellow>
>>           <xapG:black>75.000000</xapG:black>
>>        </rdf:li>
>>     </rdf:Seq>
>>  </xapG:Colorants>
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Reinhard
>>
>
> Thanks Reinhard, you found the answer for me.  Now I am looking
> through the xcolor manual trying to get know how to convert (cyan:51,
> yellow:94) to correct xcolor expression (i.e., cyan!xx!yellow!yy) that
> can be used in my document.  The strange part is that 51 + 94 != 100.
>

Actually, I want to ask, in PDF, the (cyan:51, yellow:94) means 51% of
cyan and 94% of yellow or 51 units of cyan and 94 units of yellow?

> Best Regards,
> narke
>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Reinhard Kotucha                                      Phone: +49-511-3373112
>> Marschnerstr. 25
>> D-30167 Hannover                              mailto:reinhard.kotucha at web.de
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence
>     -- Schopenhauer
>
> narke
> public key at http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371 (narkewoody at gmail.com)
>



-- 
Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence
    -- Schopenhauer

narke
public key at http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371 (narkewoody at gmail.com)