if you were writing a physics paper with a lot of QM,
William F. Adams
willadams at aol.com
Thu Jan 5 15:23:39 CET 2023
Would it be an option to use literate programming?
That allows one to use the full power of TeX (in making the PDF) and to write out arbitrary files (which would be your computer algebra system), and to get a nice typeset .pdf
William
-----Original Message-----
From: Deyan Ginev <deyan.ginev at gmail.com>
To: Mike Marchywka <marchywka at hotmail.com>
Cc: texhax at tug.org
Sent: Thu, Jan 5, 2023 9:15 am
Subject: Re: if you were writing a physics paper with a lot of QM,
Hi Mike,
If you wanted to integrate your numerical tools with your publication tools, the sane choice would be as you mentioned - have your CAS-powered notebook emit a LaTeX document as an export.
Sadly, that often turns out to be too "vanilla" for power users, so you may end up writing templates/customizations to the emitted LaTeX. I will go on a limb and state that the perfect system for the workflow you describe has not yet been created, though various interesting experiments are ongoing.
As one example, Google's "latexify" annotations for Python have been getting a positive reception recently:https://github.com/google/latexify_py
As to the article you used as an example, the TeX it was written in seems to already be friendly enough to do more than just PDF. Here's a sample:
https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1810.11016
Greetings,Deyan
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 8:43 AM Mike Marchywka <marchywka at hotmail.com> wrote:
I just ran into this,
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.11016.pdf
which seems to illustrate a lot of typical math.
If you were authoring math oriented
documents and wanted to integrate your analysis
and publications, what would your source code
be for equations like this? I would imagine
you could do it in mathmatica or
matlab and export latex but how does
that integrate with high performance
code that you may use for numerical
solutions?
Again, I'm not big on appearance and don't
expect my latex code to be publication quality
but just curious about maintaining consistency
among pieces to avoid publication errors.
And trying to figure out what software to work
with :) My algebra has not gotten much better
with age...
"MikeMath" or my home brew mathmatica
seems to be coming together- although
an "on the fly" incremental math renderer
may be better than latexmk. I'm trying to
figure out what to do with some tensor
and operator implementations as well as the
bra/ket notations etc.
Also finding bugs in "chromate" by TooBib
and stand-alone file downloader that uses
largely headless chrome. I should replace the
nodejs wscat with a real websocket library
and find a better way to serialize asynchronous
events but as kluged as it is is seems to work
pretty well for now. Hopefully as I encounter
more websites I can learn more javascript
for stuff to emulate. As this does not use
puppeter, and talks directly to the chrome debug port,
its interesting webtool lol.
Thanks.
--
mike marchywka
306 charles cox
canton GA 30115
USA, Earth
marchywka at hotmail.com
404-788-1216
ORCID: 0000-0001-9237-455X
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/attachments/20230105/a18e6fcd/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the texhax
mailing list.