[texhax] Distress call
Rolf Turner
r.turner at auckland.ac.nz
Thu May 6 03:54:49 CEST 2010
On 6/05/2010, at 1:36 PM, Alan T Litchfield wrote:
> Oh Reinhard I am sorry but those who have said so already are correct.
>
> To say "I'm wondering whether a mail with such a braindead subject
> line..." in anyone's language cannot be interpreted in any other way.
> It is arrogant and rude.
>
> It is not that others misunderstood you, it is that you constructed it
> to be that way.
>
> And as Paul said. That is all that needs to be said on the subject.
Who says? Isn't that a bit arrogant? You are demanding to have the
last word and saying that anyone who disagrees with you has to shut up.
Well ***I'm*** sorry, but I disagree with you. The subject line *was*
braindead and begged that the inquiry be ignored. The OP should learn
to use informative subject lines when emailing a list such as this. If
Reinhard hadn't brusquely informed him of this, how would he learn? A
bit of vitriol focuses the attention wondrously.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
######################################################################
Attention:
This e-mail message is privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author.
This e-mail has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal
www.marshalsoftware.com
######################################################################
More information about the texhax
mailing list